EE 420L
Analog
Integrated Circuit Design Laboratory
Laboratory
Report 4: Op-Amps II, Gain-Bandwidth Product and Slewing
AUTHOR:
Bryan Kerstetter
EMAIL:
kerstett@unlv.nevada.edu
JANUARY
30, 2019
General
Overview
This laboratory further introduces students to
operational amplifiers. While also introducing concepts regarding the
gain-bandwidth product and slewing. The gain-bandwidth product will then be
used to calculate the bandwidths of op amp topologies with varying gains.
Additionally, the slew rate of the LM324 Op Amp will also be calculated.
Prelab
I watched Dr. Baker’s
second video about Op Amps while also reviewing the concepts covered in my Laboratory
Report 3.
Description
of Laboratory Procedures
{The LM324
is exclusively used throughout this laboratory}
{During this laboratory we assume that VCC+
= +5V and VCC- = 0V.}
{For oscilloscope images, assume that the
yellow and blue traces are the input and output signals, respectively}
The Gain-Bandwidth Product
According to the LM324 datasheet,
the gain-bandwidth product is 1.3 MHz as seen in Figure 1.
Figure 1
This
gain-bandwidth product can be used to determine the open loop frequency
response of the op amp as seen in Figure 2.
Figure 2
Bandwidths of a Non-Inverting Op-Amp
Topology Under Various Gains
Hand
Calculations
The bandwidth of a non-inverting op-amp topology with
a certain gain can be calculated in the following manner.
[1]
Therefore, the bandwidths of a noninverting topology under
various gains can be calculated.
[2]
[3]
[4]
Upon looking at Equations 2-3, we see that they are in agreement
with the bode plot as seen in Figure 2. The gain of the non-inverting op-amp
topology that we used can be seen in Equation 5.
[5]
Non-Inverting
Topology: Gain of 1
We implemented the circuit as seen in Figure 3 on the
breadboard. According to LTspice the bandwidth of
simple LM324 voltage follower is 1.17
MHz as seen in Figure 4.
Figure 3
Figure 4
Experimentally, we were looking for when the output
waveform is –3dB the magnitude of the input waveform. In other words, we were
looking for what frequency the output waveform of 70.1 mVpp.
[5]
Figures 5 demonstrate the experimental results. The
experimental results show that the bandwidth of 1.34 MHz
Figure 5
Non-Inverting
Topology: Gain of 5
We implemented the circuit as seen in Figure 6 on the
breadboard. According to LTspice the bandwidth 206 kHz as seen in Figure 7.
Figure 6
Figure 7
Experimentally, we were looking for when the output
waveform is –3dB the magnitude of the input waveform. In other words, we were
looking for what frequency the output waveform of 70.1 mVpp.
[6]
[7]
Figures 5 demonstrate the experimental results. The
experimental results show that the bandwidth of 137.2 kHz
Figure 8
Non-Inverting
Topology: Gain of 10
We implemented the circuit as seen in Figure 9 on the
breadboard. According to LTspice the bandwidth 85.5 kHz as seen in Figure 10.
Figure 9
Figure 10
Experimentally, we were looking for when the output
waveform is –3dB the magnitude of the input waveform. In other words, we were
looking for what frequency the output waveform of 140 mVpp.
p [8]
[9]
Figures 11 demonstrate the experimental results. The
experimental results show that the bandwidth of 83.15 kHz.
Figure 11
Comparing
Hand Calculations, LTspice, and Experimental Results
Gain |
Hand
Calculations |
Ltspice |
Experimental
Results |
1 |
1.3 MHz |
1.17 Mhz |
1.34 MHz |
5 |
260 kHz |
206 kHz |
137.2 kHz |
10 |
130 kHz |
85.5 kHz |
83.15 kHz |
Bandwidths of an Inverting Op-Amp Topology
Under Various Gains
Hand
Calculations
Figure 12
Figure 12 shows the circuit used to experimentally
measure the bandwidth of inverting op-amp topology under different gains. The
band width of a
[10]
[11]
Therefore, the bandwidths of a noninverting topology under
various gains can be calculated.
[12]
[13]
[14]
Inverting
Topology: Gain of -1
We implemented the circuit as seen in Figure 13 on the
breadboard. According to LTspice the bandwidth 688 kHz as seen in Figure 14.
Figure 13
Figure 14
Experimentally, we were looking for when the output
waveform is –3dB the magnitude of the input waveform. In other words, we were
looking for what frequency the output waveform of 70.1 mVpp.
[15]
Figures 15 demonstrate the experimental results. The
experimental results show that the bandwidth of 5.75 MHz This frequency is vastly different when compared to our
theoretical and experimental values. This reason for this is unknown. Possibly,
there were some factors that we did not take in account.
Figure 15
Inverting
Topology: Gain of -5
We implemented the circuit as seen in Figure 16 on the
breadboard. According to LTspice the bandwidth 149 kHz as seen in Figure 17.
Figure 16
Figure 17
Experimentally, we were looking for when the output
waveform is –3dB the magnitude of the input waveform. In other words, we were
looking for what frequency the output waveform of 70.1 mVpp.
[16]
[17]
Figures 18 demonstrate the experimental results. The
experimental results show that the bandwidth of 225 kHz The oscilloscope was not properly reading the frequency. Therefore,
the reading of 225 kHz comes from the function generator.
Figure 18
Inverting
Topology: Gain of -10
We implemented the circuit as seen in Figure 19 on the
breadboard. According to LTspice the bandwidth 78.4 kHz as seen in Figure 20.
Figure 19
Figure 20
Experimentally, we were looking for when the output
waveform is –3dB the magnitude of the input waveform. In other words, we were
looking for what frequency the output waveform of 140 mVpp.
p [18]
[19]
Figures 11 demonstrate the experimental results. The
experimental results show that the bandwidth of 108 kHz. The oscilloscope was not properly reading the frequency. Therefore,
the reading of 108 kHz comes from the function generator.
Figure 21
Comparing
Hand Calculations, LTspice, and Experimental Results
Gain |
Hand
Calculations |
Ltspice |
Experimental
Results |
-1 |
650 kHz |
688 khz |
5.75 MHz |
-5 |
216 kHz |
149 kHz |
225 kHz |
-10 |
118 kHz |
78.4 kHz |
108 kHz |
The LM324 Slew Rate
An op-amp’s slew rate is the rate at which voltage
change. In other words, slew rate Figure 22 depicts the circuit we designed to
measure the slew rate of the LM324. The design implements a simple unity gain
non-inverting topology. Vsignal is
where the signal will be placed. In this laboratory, we built a circuit where Vsignal was a pulse and a square wave.
[20]
Figure 22
Slew
Rate with Pulse Vsignal Input
In Figure 23 we see that the 5 kHz frequency is not
great enough for the LM324 slew rate to be a huge factor. However, at the
greater frequency of 170 kHz we can evidently see the effect of the slew rate
(Figure 24). The slew rate can be calculated based upon the cursor measurements
seen in Figure 24.
[21]
Figure 23: 5 kHz
Figure 24: 170 kHz
Slew
Rate with Sinusoid Vsignal Input
In Figure 25 we see that the 10 kHz frequency is not
great enough for the LM324 slew rate to be a huge factor. However, at the
greater frequency of 170 kHz we can evidently see the effect of the slew rate
(Figure 26). The slew rate can be calculated based upon the cursor measurements
seen in Figure 26.
[22]
Figure 25: 10 kHz
Figure 26: 170 kHz
Slew
Rate According to the LM324 Datasheet
The slew rate per the LM324 data sheet is 400 mV/µs
when the given parameters are implemented.
Figure 27
Comparing
Slew Rate Values
|
Sinusoid
Vsignal |
Pulse
Vsignal |
Datasheet
|
Slew
Rate (mV/µs) |
|
|
400 |
There is little difference between our experimental
slew rates under pulse and sinusoid Vsignals. However, there was a much more significant difference
between the experimental slew rates and the slew rate given in the LM324
datasheet. This difference is most likely due to the fact that our slew rate
test circuit was most likely different than STs slew rate test circuit.
Additionally, the slew rate in the datasheet was given with a whole host of parameters
as seen in Figure 27. Our test circuit parameters were much different.
Return to EE
420L Spring 2019 Page
Return to Dr. Baker’s CMOSedu homepage