Lab 4 - EE 420L: Engineering Electronics II



James Mellott

mellott@unlv.nevada.edu
02/20/2017  


Lab 4: Op-amps II, gain-bandwidth product and slewing 

Again, this lab will utilize the LM324 op-amp (LM324.pdf).

For the following questions and experiments assume VCC+ = +5V and VCC- = 0V.

Experiment 1:

Estimate, using the datasheet, the bandwidths for non-inverting op-amp topologies having gains of 1, 5, and 10. 

The datasheet indicates the unity gain frequency seen below in figure 1,  http://cmosedu.com/jbaker/courses/ee420L/s16/students/monahan/Lab4/lab4_files/image002.png , is 1.3MHz at 30V. 

http://cmosedu.com/jbaker/courses/ee420L/s16/students/monahan/Lab4/lab4_files/image004.jpg

Figure 1

Below in figure 2  is the open loop frequency response graph which can be used to esitmate the bandwidths of each gain.

Figure 2

From figure 2 I can esitimate the unity gain frequency around 700kHz and a gain of 5 is around 120kHz and a gain of 10 is roughly 80kHz.  These estimates are based on a V+ voltage of 10 to 15 Vdc.  After the experimental resluts will be a table consolidating the extracted information.

Below in figure 3 is the schematic used to obtain the experimental unity gain bandwidth and the 3 db frequency followed by the experimental results.  A 200mv pk-pk sine wave signal was used for the input.  As you can see there is a delay on the output signal, I believe this is due to the slew rate which will be discussed at the end of this report.

Figure 3

Below in figure 4 is the schematic used to obtain the experimental results of an opamp with a gain of 5 and it’s correlating bandwidth and the 3 db frequency followed by the experimental results.  A 50mV RMS sine wave signal was used for the input.

Figure 4

Below in figure 5 is the schematic used to obtain the experimental results of an opamp with a gain of 10 and it’s correlating bandwidth and the 3 db frequency followed by the experimental results.  A 50mV RMS sine wave signal was used for the input.

Figure 5

Below in table 1 is the consolidated information gathered above. *The 3db frequency was obtained by taking the Vout without roll off and multiplying by .707*.  Bandwidth is the corresponding 3db frequency.

Gain

Input Voltage (mV RMS)

3db Output (mV RMS)

Experimental Bandwidth (kHz)

Estimated Bandwidth (kHz)

Theoretical Bandwidth from GBP @30V V+

1

70

53

728

700

1.3MHz

5

50

175

170

120

260kHz

10

50

350

85

80

130kHz

Table 1

My esitmated Bandwidths were fairly close to the experimental results, the difference can be explained in the V+ Voltage I used in my experiments vs the V+ voltage used to obtain the results on the data sheet.  I used 5V V+ the data sheet uses 10-15V V+.  The theortical bandwidth was obtained with the following equation: 

 

Repeat these steps using the inverting op-amp topology having gains of -1, -5, and -10.

Below in figure 6 is the schematic used to obtain the experimental negative unity gain bandwidth and the 3 db frequency followed by the experimental results.  A 50mv RMS signal was used to show the -1 gain while A 70mv RMS sine wave signal was used for the input to show the 3db frequency.  This is because the pictures were taken on separate days.

Figure 6

Below in figure 7 is the schematic used to obtain the experimental results of an opamp with a gain of -5 and it’s correlating bandwidth and the 3 db frequency followed by the experimental results.  A 15mV RMS sine wave signal was used for the input.

Figure 7

Below in figure 8 is the schematic used to obtain the experimental results of an opamp with a gain of -10 and it’s correlating bandwidth and the 3 db frequency followed by the experimental results.  A 15mV RMS sine wave signal was used for the input.

Figure 8

Below in table 2 is the consolidated information gathered above. *The 3db frequency was obtained by taking the Vout without roll off and multiplying by .707*.  Bandwidth is the corresponding 3db frequency.

Gain

Input Voltage (mV RMS)

3db Output (mV RMS)

Experimental Bandwidth (kHz)

Estimated Bandwidth (kHz)

Theoretical Bandwidth from GBP @30V V+

-1

70

49

546

600

650kHz

-5

15

53

141

200

217kHz

-10

15

106

80

85

118kHz

Table 2

At lower gains the bandwidth is much lower than the positive gain counterparts.  This needs to be taken into consideration when estimating the bandwitdh of the inverting topology vs the non-inverting topology.  The theoretical values were obtained with the following equation: .

Experiment 2

Design circuits for measuring the slew-rate of the LM324. One circuit should use a pulse input while the other should use a sinewave input. Provide comments to support your design decisions.  Comment on any differences between your measurements and the datasheet’s specifications.

The LM324 datasheet lists the slew rate at http://cmosedu.com/jbaker/courses/ee420L/s16/students/monahan/Lab4/lab4_files/image042.png as seen from figure 9 below.

http://cmosedu.com/jbaker/courses/ee420L/s16/students/monahan/Lab4/lab4_files/image044.jpg

Figure 9

Below in figure 10 is the schematic used to determine the slew rate of the LM324 followed by the square wavie input signal and the sine wave input signal results.

Figure 10

The slew rate was calculated using the following equation: .  My experimental slew rate is roughly half of that shown on the data sheet.  My experiment was not driving a load, and the data sheet’s result was determined using an RC load.  A resitor value of 2k and a capcitance of 100pf which introduces a time delay of 0.14us.  I believe this would bring my experimental slew rate value up to roughly .25V/us which is still far off from the data sheet value.  A different reason could be the V+ of my setup vs the V+ of the data sheet, I used 5V and the data sheet value was obtained with a V+ of 15V.  *NOTE* The frequency needed to be much higher for the sine wave input vs the square wave input to obtain the slew rate.  Which makes sense as the square wave’s demand for change in voltage over time is much greater then that of the sine wave.

After the slew rate experiment I have concluded that the slew rate introduced the phase shift found in experiment 1.

 

Return to My Lab Index

 

Return to EE 420L Spring 2017

 

Return to Dr. Baker’s Course Listings