I
have some questions about the SF gain
calculations on page 670 and 691
As I
am going through Ch. 21, I have a
question on the Av
calculation for the
SF
Amp on page 691. If I use the
earlier approach in calculating the gain,
shouldn't
it be something like
vout
= (1/gmn
|| ron)id
(the
resistance looking into the source, 1/gmn,
in parallel with ron)
vin
= (1/gmn + ron)id
(vin
= vgs
+ vds)
Therefore,
vout/vin
=
(1/gmn)/(ron
+
1/gmn)
which is different from the Av
in the book (and
close
to zero). What am I doing wrong?
On
page 670 the load is a gate-drain
connected device with a small-signal
resistance
of approximately 1/gmn
so
what you've written for vout
above
is
correct for Fig. 21.15. On page 691
the load is infinite (that is why
we've
included the body effect on pages
691-692). So for vin
in the NMOS
SF on
page 670, and assuming 1/gmn
<< ron,
we get
vin
= vgs2
+ id(1/gmn)
= id(1/gmn
+ 1/gmn)
knowing
vout
= id/gmn
leads to Eq.
(21.33). You likely already understand
this
so let me try and answer your
question a different way.
In
Fig. 21.40 note that the MOSFET’s
output resistance isn't included in the
calculation.
The ron
ends up having a
small effect compared the body effect. If
you
think of the MOSFET’s output resistance
going from drain to source of the
MOSFET
(drain is at AC ground) then you
shunt the ideal DC current source
with ron.
Now,
you can write, neglecting body
effect,
vout
= idron
vin
= vgs
+ idron
= id(1/gmn
+ ron)
vout/vin
= ron/(1/gmn
+ ron)
which
is approximately 1 and what we
derived for the SF with current source
load,
Fig. (21.39) and Eq. (21.89).
Why
wasn't ron
included in the
calculation on page 691? Because with body
effect
we get a gain of, for example,
0.7 while with the MOSFET’s output
resistance
included in the gain
calculation, with no body effect, we get to 0.98.