I
had a quick question on deriving voltage gain of a common-source amp with
source degeneration. Please see attached PDF file. I
derived the voltage gain using the regular method (method 1) and by inspection
(method2). I get different answers from the 2 methods, although upon plugging
in the numbers the answers are numerically about the same (same up to the
second decimal). I am unable to algebraically reduce the symbolic results to
show they are equal.
Method
1 in your PDF is exact but it doesn't lend itself to intuitive
understanding. Method 2 is easy to understand intuitively but it isn't exact.
Yes, as you noted the results are about the same.
Why
the difference? When you look at the resistance looking into the source of the
MOSFET it isn't exactly 1/gm as specified in Method 2 but rather
(1
+ Ro/ro)/(gm +2/ro + Ro/ro^2)
If
ro >> Ro then the resistance looking into the source is 1/gm and the two
methods give the same results.
In
later printings of the book I changed the more advanced discussion of the
resistance looking into the source with a very large load Ro, see pages 688-690
here, to keep things
more general. Specifically see Eq. (21.81) and Fig. 21.37.
For
the question at the bottom of the PDF,
superposition allows you to look at sources separately so it is fine to
short-out the input source when determining the resistance looking into the
drain. For exact analysis make sure you use the same circuit for all analyses.
Don't lump the resistance looking into the drain into a single resistor
connected to the output, like we do for the fast/intuitive analysis, and then
try to calculate the exact gain.